1
00:00:00,050 --> 00:00:06,710
Lesson reporting and communicating AI system risks reporting and communicating AI system risks are fundamental

2
00:00:06,710 --> 00:00:13,610
aspects of AI governance, particularly within the context of AI auditing, evaluation and impact measurement.

3
00:00:14,150 --> 00:00:20,180
These processes are essential for ensuring accountability, transparency, and trust in AI systems,

4
00:00:20,180 --> 00:00:24,380
especially as they become increasingly integrated into various sectors.

5
00:00:25,100 --> 00:00:30,860
Effective reporting and communication of AI system risks involve understanding the nature of these risks,

6
00:00:30,860 --> 00:00:37,160
developing robust methodologies for their identification and assessment, and implementing clear strategies

7
00:00:37,160 --> 00:00:39,500
for conveying these risks to stakeholders.

8
00:00:41,300 --> 00:00:47,090
AI systems pose unique risks that are multifaceted and can have significant implications for individuals,

9
00:00:47,090 --> 00:00:49,550
organizations, and society at large.

10
00:00:49,580 --> 00:00:55,670
These risks can be categorized into several types, including operational, ethical, legal, and societal

11
00:00:55,670 --> 00:00:56,360
risks.

12
00:00:56,990 --> 00:01:02,750
Operational risks involve failures or malfunctions within the AI system itself, potentially leading

13
00:01:02,780 --> 00:01:05,060
to incorrect or harmful outputs.

14
00:01:05,090 --> 00:01:11,960
Ethical risks pertain to biases and fairness issues that may arise from data inputs or algorithmic processes

15
00:01:11,960 --> 00:01:14,570
disproportionately affecting certain groups.

16
00:01:14,930 --> 00:01:20,780
Legal risks encompass issues related to compliance with regulations and standards, while societal risks

17
00:01:20,780 --> 00:01:24,350
involve broader impacts on public trust and social norms.

18
00:01:26,210 --> 00:01:32,270
To effectively report and communicate these risks, a comprehensive risk assessment framework is necessary.

19
00:01:33,050 --> 00:01:38,150
This framework should begin with the identification of potential risks through various methods such

20
00:01:38,150 --> 00:01:42,740
as expert consultations, literature reviews, and empirical studies.

21
00:01:43,490 --> 00:01:49,010
For example, a study by Binns highlights the importance of considering the social and ethical implications

22
00:01:49,010 --> 00:01:53,390
of AI systems, particularly in terms of fairness and accountability.

23
00:01:54,140 --> 00:02:00,050
Once identified, these risks must be evaluated in terms of their likelihood and potential impact,

24
00:02:00,050 --> 00:02:06,380
which can be facilitated through quantitative methods like statistical analysis and qualitative approaches

25
00:02:06,380 --> 00:02:08,540
such as scenario analysis.

26
00:02:09,470 --> 00:02:15,050
A critical component of this framework is the development of metrics and indicators that can quantify

27
00:02:15,050 --> 00:02:17,300
and qualify the identified risks.

28
00:02:17,840 --> 00:02:24,590
Metrics for operational risks might include system accuracy rates, error margins, and downtime frequencies.

29
00:02:24,590 --> 00:02:29,450
While ethical risks could be assessed through measures of algorithmic bias and fairness.

30
00:02:30,020 --> 00:02:36,290
Legal risks might involve compliance audits and regulatory benchmarks, and societal risks could be

31
00:02:36,290 --> 00:02:40,340
evaluated through public perception surveys and impact studies.

32
00:02:40,670 --> 00:02:46,190
For instance, a report by the European Commission Joint Research Centre provides a comprehensive set

33
00:02:46,190 --> 00:02:54,200
of indicators for assessing AI risks, emphasizing the need for a multidimensional approach once risks

34
00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:59,390
have been assessed, the next step is to develop a structured reporting system that can effectively

35
00:02:59,390 --> 00:03:02,240
communicate these risks to relevant stakeholders.

36
00:03:02,630 --> 00:03:08,780
This system should include clear, concise, and actionable reports that highlight key findings, potential

37
00:03:08,780 --> 00:03:11,720
impacts, and recommended mitigation strategies.

38
00:03:12,260 --> 00:03:18,710
The use of visual aids such as charts, graphs, and dashboards can enhance the clarity and accessibility

39
00:03:18,710 --> 00:03:19,880
of these reports.

40
00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:26,240
For example, a case study on AI risk management by Gartner demonstrates the effectiveness of using

41
00:03:26,240 --> 00:03:32,870
interactive dashboards to convey risk information to executive boards, enabling informed decision making.

42
00:03:34,370 --> 00:03:40,040
Communication strategies must also take into account the diverse nature of stakeholders, which can

43
00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:44,930
range from technical experts and regulators to end users and the general public.

44
00:03:45,980 --> 00:03:51,500
Tailoring the communication approach to the specific needs and levels of understanding of these groups

45
00:03:51,500 --> 00:03:52,400
is crucial.

46
00:03:52,940 --> 00:03:59,780
For instance, technical stakeholders may require detailed technical reports and data, while non-technical

47
00:03:59,780 --> 00:04:04,100
stakeholders might benefit from simplified summaries and infographics.

48
00:04:04,130 --> 00:04:10,340
A study by Veale and Binns underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in AI systems,

49
00:04:10,370 --> 00:04:16,220
advocating for the use of clear and accessible communication methods to bridge the gap between technical

50
00:04:16,220 --> 00:04:19,100
complexity and stakeholder understanding.

51
00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:26,540
Additionally, fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes transparency and open communication

52
00:04:26,540 --> 00:04:28,730
about AI risks is essential.

53
00:04:29,300 --> 00:04:35,330
This involves establishing policies and practices that encourage regular risk reporting, open dialogue,

54
00:04:35,330 --> 00:04:36,920
and continuous improvement.

55
00:04:37,550 --> 00:04:43,430
Training programs and workshops can be implemented to educate employees and stakeholders about AI risks

56
00:04:43,430 --> 00:04:45,800
and effective communication strategies.

57
00:04:46,220 --> 00:04:52,340
For example, the AI Now Institute's annual report emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration

58
00:04:52,340 --> 00:04:57,530
and continuous learning to address the evolving risks associated with AI systems.

59
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:05,360
Moreover, leveraging external audits and third party evaluations can enhance the credibility and objectivity

60
00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:06,980
of AI risk reports.

61
00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:13,580
Independent audits provide an unbiased assessment of AI systems, often uncovering risks that internal

62
00:05:13,580 --> 00:05:14,990
teams may overlook.

63
00:05:15,590 --> 00:05:21,350
These audits can be conducted by specialized firms or academic institutions with expertise in AI ethics

64
00:05:21,350 --> 00:05:22,190
and governance.

65
00:05:22,220 --> 00:05:28,190
The findings from these audits should be transparently reported and discussed with stakeholders to ensure

66
00:05:28,220 --> 00:05:30,560
accountability and drive improvements.

67
00:05:31,010 --> 00:05:37,220
A notable example is the audit of the Compas algorithm by ProPublica, which revealed significant biases

68
00:05:37,220 --> 00:05:42,860
in the system's risk assessment process, leading to widespread public and regulatory scrutiny.

69
00:05:44,840 --> 00:05:51,050
In conclusion, reporting and communicating AI system risks are critical components of AI governance

70
00:05:51,050 --> 00:05:54,740
that require a comprehensive and multifaceted approach.

71
00:05:55,130 --> 00:06:01,190
By developing robust risk assessment frameworks, creating clear and actionable reports, tailoring

72
00:06:01,190 --> 00:06:07,130
communication strategies to diverse stakeholders, fostering a culture of transparency and leveraging

73
00:06:07,130 --> 00:06:13,730
external audits, organizations can effectively address and mitigate the risks associated with AI systems.

74
00:06:13,730 --> 00:06:19,430
This not only ensures compliance with regulatory standards, but also builds public trust and enhances

75
00:06:19,430 --> 00:06:23,150
the overall integrity and reliability of AI technologies.

76
00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:29,390
As AI continues to evolve, ongoing efforts to refine and improve these processes will be essential

77
00:06:29,390 --> 00:06:32,960
to navigate the complex landscape of AI risks and governance.