1 00:00:00,050 --> 00:00:02,930 Lesson conducting algorithm impact assessments. 2 00:00:02,960 --> 00:00:08,930 Conducting algorithm impact assessments is a crucial part of the AI development life cycle, particularly 3 00:00:08,930 --> 00:00:11,360 during the development and testing phases. 4 00:00:11,810 --> 00:00:18,080 It involves evaluating the potential consequences of deploying an algorithm in real world scenarios, 5 00:00:18,080 --> 00:00:24,110 ensuring that the benefits outweigh the risks, and that any adverse effects are mitigated. 6 00:00:24,140 --> 00:00:30,080 This process is essential not only for compliance with regulatory standards, but also for maintaining 7 00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:34,370 public trust and the ethical integrity of AI applications. 8 00:00:35,180 --> 00:00:41,210 Algorithm impact assessments are designed to systematically evaluate the risks and benefits associated 9 00:00:41,210 --> 00:00:43,190 with the deployment of an algorithm. 10 00:00:43,700 --> 00:00:49,640 This process involves several steps, including identifying potential impacts, assessing the likelihood 11 00:00:49,640 --> 00:00:54,800 and severity of these impacts, and developing strategies to mitigate any negative outcomes. 12 00:00:55,490 --> 00:01:00,920 The primary goal is to ensure that the algorithm operates as intended, and does not produce unintended 13 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:02,280 harmful effects. 14 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:09,510 One of the first steps in conducting an AIA is to identify the stakeholders who may be affected by the 15 00:01:09,510 --> 00:01:10,320 algorithm. 16 00:01:11,220 --> 00:01:17,130 This includes not only the end users, but also any individuals or groups who may be indirectly impacted. 17 00:01:17,610 --> 00:01:23,310 For example, an algorithm used in hiring decisions could affect not only job applicants, but also 18 00:01:23,310 --> 00:01:26,880 existing employees, managers, and even the company's reputation. 19 00:01:27,510 --> 00:01:31,680 Identifying all relevant stakeholders is essential for a comprehensive assessment. 20 00:01:33,450 --> 00:01:38,880 Once the stakeholders have been identified, the next step is to analyze the potential impacts of the 21 00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:40,860 algorithm on these stakeholders. 22 00:01:41,370 --> 00:01:47,910 This involves considering both direct and indirect effects as well as short term and long term consequences. 23 00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:54,720 For instance, an algorithm designed to detect fraudulent transactions may reduce fraud in the short 24 00:01:54,750 --> 00:02:01,230 term, but could also lead to increased scrutiny of certain demographic groups, resulting in long term 25 00:02:01,230 --> 00:02:04,190 issues related to discrimination and bias. 26 00:02:04,310 --> 00:02:09,980 It is important to consider a wide range of potential impacts to ensure that no significant risks are 27 00:02:09,980 --> 00:02:10,820 overlooked. 28 00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:18,560 In addition to identifying potential impacts, it is also necessary to assess the likelihood and severity 29 00:02:18,560 --> 00:02:19,730 of these impacts. 30 00:02:21,020 --> 00:02:26,420 This involves evaluating the probability that a particular impact will occur, as well as the potential 31 00:02:26,420 --> 00:02:27,950 magnitude of the impact. 32 00:02:28,580 --> 00:02:34,760 For example, an algorithm with a high likelihood of causing minor inconvenience to users may be considered 33 00:02:34,760 --> 00:02:39,020 less risky than one with a low likelihood of causing significant harm. 34 00:02:39,440 --> 00:02:45,800 This step often involves quantitative analysis, such as statistical modeling or scenario analysis, 35 00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:49,400 to estimate the potential risks associated with the algorithm. 36 00:02:50,510 --> 00:02:56,300 Once the potential impacts have been identified and assessed, the next step is to develop strategies 37 00:02:56,300 --> 00:02:58,700 to mitigate any negative outcomes. 38 00:02:59,180 --> 00:03:05,180 This may involve modifying the algorithm itself, implementing additional safeguards or providing training 39 00:03:05,180 --> 00:03:07,250 and resources to stakeholders. 40 00:03:07,610 --> 00:03:13,700 For example, an algorithm used in health care could be modified to include additional checks and balances 41 00:03:13,700 --> 00:03:20,060 to ensure patient safety or health care providers could be trained on how to use the algorithm effectively. 42 00:03:20,810 --> 00:03:26,360 Implementing these mitigation strategies is crucial for reducing the overall risk associated with the 43 00:03:26,360 --> 00:03:27,140 algorithm. 44 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:35,090 An important aspect of conducting IIAs is ensuring transparency and accountability throughout the process. 45 00:03:35,780 --> 00:03:41,180 This involves documenting the assessment process, including the methods used to identify and assess 46 00:03:41,180 --> 00:03:46,400 potential impacts, as well as the strategies developed to mitigate negative outcomes. 47 00:03:46,850 --> 00:03:53,210 Transparency is essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring that the algorithm is used responsibly. 48 00:03:54,020 --> 00:04:00,260 For example, a study by Veale and Binns found that transparency in algorithmic decision making processes 49 00:04:00,290 --> 00:04:04,340 is critical for ensuring accountability and fostering public trust. 50 00:04:05,710 --> 00:04:11,350 In addition to transparency, it is also important to involve stakeholders in the assessment process. 51 00:04:12,010 --> 00:04:17,500 This can help to ensure that all relevant perspectives are considered and that the assessment is comprehensive. 52 00:04:18,220 --> 00:04:24,580 Stakeholder involvement can take many forms such as conducting surveys, holding focus groups, or engaging 53 00:04:24,580 --> 00:04:26,230 in public consultations. 54 00:04:26,740 --> 00:04:32,440 For example, a study by Martin found that involving stakeholders in the assessment process can lead 55 00:04:32,470 --> 00:04:37,030 to more accurate and comprehensive evaluations of potential impacts. 56 00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:38,470 Ethics. 57 00:04:38,710 --> 00:04:44,500 The importance of conducting IIAs is underscored by several high profile cases where the deployment 58 00:04:44,500 --> 00:04:48,040 of algorithms has led to significant negative outcomes. 59 00:04:48,850 --> 00:04:51,640 For example, a study by Angwin et al. 60 00:04:51,640 --> 00:04:57,220 Found that a widely used algorithm for predicting recidivism in the criminal justice system was biased 61 00:04:57,220 --> 00:05:02,440 against African American defendants, leading to unfair and potentially harmful outcomes. 62 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:08,780 This case highlights the need for thorough impact assessments to identify and address potential biases 63 00:05:08,780 --> 00:05:12,350 and ensure that algorithms are used fairly and ethically. 64 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:17,780 Another example is the use of algorithms in hiring decisions. 65 00:05:18,230 --> 00:05:19,820 A study by Raghavan et al. 66 00:05:19,820 --> 00:05:25,790 Found that algorithms used in hiring can perpetuate existing biases and discrimination, leading to 67 00:05:25,820 --> 00:05:28,820 unfair outcomes for certain demographic groups. 68 00:05:29,300 --> 00:05:35,750 This underscores the importance of conducting IIAs to identify and mitigate potential biases in algorithms, 69 00:05:35,750 --> 00:05:38,990 ensuring that they are used in a fair and equitable manner. 70 00:05:40,250 --> 00:05:46,940 Growing use of AI in various sectors has led to increased scrutiny and calls for more rigorous impact 71 00:05:46,940 --> 00:05:47,810 assessments. 72 00:05:48,290 --> 00:05:54,320 For example, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation includes provisions for conducting 73 00:05:54,320 --> 00:05:59,870 data protection impact assessments for certain types of data processing activities, including those 74 00:05:59,870 --> 00:06:01,460 involving algorithms. 75 00:06:01,940 --> 00:06:07,410 This regulatory framework highlights the importance of conducting thorough impact assessments to ensure 76 00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:10,080 compliance with legal and ethical standards. 77 00:06:12,060 --> 00:06:18,210 In conclusion, conducting algorithm impact assessments is a critical component of the AI development 78 00:06:18,210 --> 00:06:19,170 life cycle. 79 00:06:19,740 --> 00:06:25,920 It involves systematically evaluating the potential impacts of an algorithm on stakeholders, assessing 80 00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:31,890 the likelihood and severity of these impacts, and developing strategies to mitigate any negative outcomes. 81 00:06:32,220 --> 00:06:37,980 Ensuring transparency and involving stakeholders in the assessment process are essential for maintaining 82 00:06:37,980 --> 00:06:41,700 public trust and ensuring the responsible use of AI. 83 00:06:42,420 --> 00:06:48,360 The importance of conducting IIAs is underscored by several high profile cases where the deployment 84 00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:54,660 of algorithms has led to significant negative outcomes, highlighting the need for thorough and comprehensive 85 00:06:54,660 --> 00:06:55,560 assessments. 86 00:06:56,250 --> 00:07:01,530 As the use of AI continues to grow, the need for rigorous impact assessments will only become more 87 00:07:01,530 --> 00:07:06,840 important, ensuring that algorithms are used in a fair, ethical and responsible manner.