So WPA can be configured in two very different modes, pressured key and enterprise mode.
WPA personal mode is appropriate for most home networks.
On a password Esad and a wireless router or an access point, it has to be entered by users when connecting
to the Wi-Fi network.
And in that personal mode, wireless access can be individually or centrally managed, one password
will apply for all users and it should be manually changed on all the wireless clients once it's manually
modified on the original wireless router or app.
So then the password is stored on the wireless client.
Therefore, anyone on the computer can connect to the network and also see the password.
So enterprise mode provides the security needed for wireless networks and business environments, so
it's a lot more complicated to set up because it offers individualized and centralized control over
access to this Wi-Fi network.
So when users try to connect to the network, they need to present their login credentials.
This vote supports Aido to 1x radius authentication and is appropriate in the cases where a radius server
is deployed, it might be a little too obvious, but I just want to let you know the WPA enterprise
should only be used when a radius server is connected in order to do the client authentication.
Users will never have to deal with the actual encryption keys, they are securely created and assigned
per user session in the background after a user presents their login credentials so it prevents people
from getting the network key from any individual computers.
WPA enterprise is more secure than WPA to Kay.
Because, well, the important thing to note about the personal mode is that all the clients will always
encrypt their data with the same PMK every time.
So it's easier to gather a lot of data encrypted with the same PMK.
Now, should someone actually break the PMK, they could decrypt all the data and encrypted with that
key past and or recorded in the future or real time?
But otherwise, Enterprise provides every client different PMK instead of each client using the same
PMK all the time, right?
So it changes every session and association and that seat is random as well as unknown.
Now, should someone break a particular PMK while they only get access to that one section of that one
client, they don't get access to the user's credentials since they were individually encrypted.
That, of course, is a whole lot more secure.