1 00:00:01,040 --> 00:00:05,570 Migrate DFS to Azure File Sync. Let's consider that you're 2 00:00:05,570 --> 00:00:10,280 currently aggregating multiple file shares into a single DFS 3 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:12,780 tree infrastructure. And going further, 4 00:00:12,780 --> 00:00:16,110 you've enabled DFS replication to have multiple 5 00:00:16,110 --> 00:00:18,490 servers in your on‑premises environment, 6 00:00:18,490 --> 00:00:21,040 maintaining copies of those shared folders. 7 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:25,160 DFS has been around in Windows Server for many years as a way to make 8 00:00:25,160 --> 00:00:28,140 file shares more accessible across your organization. 9 00:00:28,140 --> 00:00:32,320 Now that we have AFS and you see how easy it is to install the agent on 10 00:00:32,320 --> 00:00:36,630 servers, register them into sync groups and get syncing, you might wonder how 11 00:00:36,630 --> 00:00:40,330 can we migrate DFSR to AFS? It's really straightforward. 12 00:00:40,330 --> 00:00:41,510 There's no magic to it. 13 00:00:41,510 --> 00:00:43,650 Of course, you're going to want to create a sync group. 14 00:00:43,650 --> 00:00:46,040 I would start with the root of the DFS tree, 15 00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:49,400 install the AFS agent on the primary DFS host, 16 00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:53,310 create a server endpoint. The big catch here is do not enable tiering. 17 00:00:53,310 --> 00:00:56,680 You don't want to have unexpected behavior between DFS, 18 00:00:56,680 --> 00:01:01,670 particularly DFS replication and AFS replication. Sync up the 19 00:01:01,670 --> 00:01:05,090 files, follow suit with your other DFS hosts, and once the 20 00:01:05,090 --> 00:01:07,640 entire file server army, as it were, 21 00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:11,440 has its file share synchronizing, now you would need to structure 22 00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:14,140 those sync groups in the cloud appropriately. 23 00:01:14,140 --> 00:01:16,860 At that point, you can retire DFS. Again, 24 00:01:16,860 --> 00:01:19,070 it's nothing that normal logic, 25 00:01:19,070 --> 00:01:25,000 it seems to me, wouldn't lead you to in terms of that migration, and that's good news, I think.