1 00:00:09,320 --> 00:00:15,260 This is one of multiple IP version six troubleshooting videos in this network. 2 00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:23,000 We've been told that router one on the left cannot ping the loopback of router three, the router on 3 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:23,720 the right. 4 00:00:24,470 --> 00:00:30,920 So let's verify that now because this is IP version six rather than IP version four. 5 00:00:30,950 --> 00:00:35,330 Notice no IP version for routes exist in the routing table. 6 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:39,230 We need to do all our testing using IP version six. 7 00:00:39,950 --> 00:00:43,460 So I'm going to ping the loopback of router three. 8 00:00:44,060 --> 00:00:45,490 We get a failure. 9 00:00:45,500 --> 00:00:50,660 We are not able to ping the loopback of router three. 10 00:00:51,500 --> 00:00:53,930 Let's do a trace router and see how far we get. 11 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:56,040 Okay. 12 00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:58,650 So what do you think about this output? 13 00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:01,730 What's going on here? 14 00:01:02,090 --> 00:01:08,360 Notice we told that the destination was not found inside the max hop count diameter. 15 00:01:09,330 --> 00:01:10,890 So let's do that again. 16 00:01:11,250 --> 00:01:12,660 Notice what's happening. 17 00:01:13,550 --> 00:01:15,770 So where is the traffic going? 18 00:01:17,180 --> 00:01:21,210 Now this is a good example of a rotting loop. 19 00:01:21,230 --> 00:01:22,850 So if we scroll up. 20 00:01:22,970 --> 00:01:24,350 Notice what's happening. 21 00:01:24,650 --> 00:01:26,750 Traffic goes to rather to. 22 00:01:26,990 --> 00:01:28,790 Then it goes to write a one. 23 00:01:28,850 --> 00:01:30,470 Then to write it to. 24 00:01:30,650 --> 00:01:36,850 Then to write a one back to write it to back to write a one and so forth and so on. 25 00:01:36,860 --> 00:01:39,710 So we have a loop taking place here. 26 00:01:40,780 --> 00:01:44,110 So let's have a look at the routing table show IPv6 route. 27 00:01:44,620 --> 00:01:52,810 Rather, one has a default route to 2001 colon one colon colon two which is rather two. 28 00:01:53,170 --> 00:01:56,800 Hence the traffic is being sent to rather two. 29 00:01:57,370 --> 00:02:01,870 But on router two show IPV six route. 30 00:02:04,110 --> 00:02:06,060 Can you see the problem here? 31 00:02:06,300 --> 00:02:10,350 Pause the video if you need to, but see if you can find the problem. 32 00:02:11,650 --> 00:02:11,950 Okay. 33 00:02:11,950 --> 00:02:17,500 So we have a static default route to router three that looks okay. 34 00:02:17,920 --> 00:02:22,810 There's a static route to the loopback of router one that also looks okay. 35 00:02:22,900 --> 00:02:27,970 Here's a static route to the loopback of router three, but that looks wrong. 36 00:02:28,510 --> 00:02:30,040 Notice where it's pointing. 37 00:02:30,460 --> 00:02:36,010 It's saying to get to the loopback of router three, we need to go via rather one. 38 00:02:36,190 --> 00:02:38,380 So that's definitely not right. 39 00:02:38,380 --> 00:02:43,930 And it's kind of redundant because we have this default route in the routing table. 40 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:47,200 So show run pipe include route. 41 00:02:47,620 --> 00:02:50,500 We need to get rid of this route. 42 00:02:51,230 --> 00:03:00,050 And either fix the next hop or simply remove it and rely on the default route here. 43 00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:02,820 So Ken wrote a one ping. 44 00:03:05,220 --> 00:03:06,900 The loopback of router three. 45 00:03:07,230 --> 00:03:07,590 Okay. 46 00:03:07,590 --> 00:03:09,390 The pings are still failing. 47 00:03:10,500 --> 00:03:12,930 Let's do a trace to that address. 48 00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:17,290 The packet gets sent to. 49 00:03:18,690 --> 00:03:22,140 Brought to, but then goes nowhere else. 50 00:03:22,380 --> 00:03:26,580 So it doesn't look like it gets any further based on that output. 51 00:03:27,420 --> 00:03:32,400 So Ken wrote it to ping the loopback of router three. 52 00:03:34,910 --> 00:03:36,020 Yes, it can. 53 00:03:36,350 --> 00:03:40,820 So rather to keeping the loop back over rather three, but rather one comping the loop back of rather 54 00:03:40,820 --> 00:03:41,420 three. 55 00:03:42,530 --> 00:03:43,570 So on rather three. 56 00:03:43,580 --> 00:03:44,900 Let's do a debug. 57 00:03:46,450 --> 00:03:53,200 And check if the traffic is actually getting to router three from router one and we can see that it 58 00:03:53,200 --> 00:04:01,300 is so we can see that the pings are arriving at rather three, but it looks like the reply is not getting 59 00:04:01,300 --> 00:04:03,130 back to right of one. 60 00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:07,570 So rather three received an echo request from 2001. 61 00:04:07,570 --> 00:04:08,500 Colon one colon. 62 00:04:08,500 --> 00:04:13,600 Colon one which is rather one destination is the loopback of router three. 63 00:04:13,900 --> 00:04:17,890 So the echo reply is sent, but it's not getting back again. 64 00:04:18,370 --> 00:04:20,470 So let's turn off debugging. 65 00:04:21,820 --> 00:04:25,330 And that's to a debug IPV six packet. 66 00:04:25,360 --> 00:04:29,320 Now, in the real world, you need to be very careful doing this. 67 00:04:30,310 --> 00:04:34,450 I'm going to send a single packet and let's see what happens. 68 00:04:34,750 --> 00:04:38,320 Again, be very careful doing this in the real world. 69 00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:39,790 You'll get a lot of output. 70 00:04:40,510 --> 00:04:46,630 Even in the small network, if we don't turn off debugging, we might get a lot of output on the console. 71 00:04:46,660 --> 00:04:52,660 So there's the debug I sent a single ping from router one two out of three. 72 00:04:53,510 --> 00:04:56,540 We got a destination lookup for that. 73 00:04:56,780 --> 00:05:01,850 The router sees that as a local network connected to the loopback. 74 00:05:02,030 --> 00:05:03,560 So that looks good. 75 00:05:03,860 --> 00:05:09,920 But notice here IPV six forward no router to destination 2001. 76 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:10,910 Colon one colon. 77 00:05:10,910 --> 00:05:21,470 Colon one source is the loopback of rudder three destination is the gigabit zero zero interface of router 78 00:05:21,470 --> 00:05:30,380 one and we told that there's no valid route so it doesn't look like router three knows how to get back 79 00:05:30,380 --> 00:05:40,520 to rata one so show IPV six route is there raft in the routing table to get back to rata one and the 80 00:05:40,520 --> 00:05:41,750 answer is no. 81 00:05:41,780 --> 00:05:52,850 We have this static route which would allow router three to ping the loopback of router one, but it 82 00:05:52,850 --> 00:05:55,880 can't ping 2001. 83 00:05:56,360 --> 00:06:04,640 So what we need to do is add a static route to 2001 colon one, colon colon zero. 84 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:05,870 Slash 64. 85 00:06:05,930 --> 00:06:07,940 And send that to. 86 00:06:08,330 --> 00:06:10,190 Rata to. 87 00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:12,860 Now let's do the ping again. 88 00:06:12,890 --> 00:06:14,840 Notice the ping succeeded. 89 00:06:17,450 --> 00:06:21,710 And without using the repeat command, the pings now succeed. 90 00:06:22,100 --> 00:06:29,840 So we can get to the loopback of router three and we can get to the physical interface of router three. 91 00:06:30,110 --> 00:06:32,090 So be careful with pings. 92 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:35,870 This applies to both IP version four and IP version six. 93 00:06:36,110 --> 00:06:42,110 Just because I can send traffic to you doesn't mean that you know how to send traffic back to me. 94 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:47,570 Both sides need routes in the routing table to enable two way communication. 95 00:06:48,050 --> 00:06:49,480 I hope you enjoyed this video. 96 00:06:49,490 --> 00:06:52,310 If it was of benefit to you, please like it. 97 00:06:52,400 --> 00:06:54,980 And please subscribe to my YouTube channel. 98 00:06:55,130 --> 00:06:57,380 I wish you all the very best.